<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Arizona Scorpions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arizonascorpionchess.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com</link>
	<description>United States Chess League</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:34:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Playoff Recap by Vinay Bhat</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/playoff-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay Bhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1606#comment-381</guid>
		<description>Robert,

47.b3? Kd4 48.Bg2 still loses, I think, to 48...f3!.
(A) 49.Bxf3 c3+ 50.Kc1 Ke3 51.Bd1 (only way to keep in touch with the e2 square) c2 52.Bxc2 dxc2 53.Kxc2 Kf4, and Black&#039;s king picks up the kingside.
(B) 49.Bf1 f2, and White can&#039;t handle the passed b-, d-, and f-pawns. After 50.bxc4 b3 51.Bxd3 b2, his pieces are overloaded.

I think 47.g5 wins, though, instead of 47.b3?. And of course, 46.gxf4+ was simpler.

Vinay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,</p>
<p>47.b3? Kd4 48.Bg2 still loses, I think, to 48&#8230;f3!.<br />
(A) 49.Bxf3 c3+ 50.Kc1 Ke3 51.Bd1 (only way to keep in touch with the e2 square) c2 52.Bxc2 dxc2 53.Kxc2 Kf4, and Black&#8217;s king picks up the kingside.<br />
(B) 49.Bf1 f2, and White can&#8217;t handle the passed b-, d-, and f-pawns. After 50.bxc4 b3 51.Bxd3 b2, his pieces are overloaded.</p>
<p>I think 47.g5 wins, though, instead of 47.b3?. And of course, 46.gxf4+ was simpler.</p>
<p>Vinay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manager Leo Martinez and Expert Amanda Mateer Preview the Playoffs by Andy Roth</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/manager-leo-martinez-and-expert-amanda-mateer-preview-the-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Roth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1593#comment-379</guid>
		<description>I tried to attend the match last night, but found all the doors to the Chavez building locked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to attend the match last night, but found all the doors to the Chavez building locked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manager Leo Martinez and Expert Amanda Mateer Preview the Playoffs by Mark Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/manager-leo-martinez-and-expert-amanda-mateer-preview-the-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ginsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1593#comment-378</guid>
		<description>Is it the unimportance of Facebook &quot;Tucson Chess Groups&quot; or the lethargy of Tucson Chess Fans?

Here I am in the luxurious commentary room filled with dozens of delicious cupcakes and nobody is yet here.  Although there are 10 minutes before the match starts.  Hurry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it the unimportance of Facebook &#8220;Tucson Chess Groups&#8221; or the lethargy of Tucson Chess Fans?</p>
<p>Here I am in the luxurious commentary room filled with dozens of delicious cupcakes and nobody is yet here.  Although there are 10 minutes before the match starts.  Hurry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FM Elliott Liu Previews the Arizona-Miami Match by Mark Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/fm-elliott-liu-previews-the-arizona-miami-match/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ginsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1547#comment-361</guid>
		<description>The AM game did not quite work out according to plan (but WOULD have if she had found 9. e4!) - I was ready to scream out WE ARE MARSHALL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AM game did not quite work out according to plan (but WOULD have if she had found 9. e4!) &#8211; I was ready to scream out WE ARE MARSHALL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Test Your Strength Against USCL Games! IM Mark Ginsburg Challenges Fans! by Mark Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/test-your-strength-against-uscl-games-im-mark-ginsburg-challenges-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ginsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1580#comment-360</guid>
		<description>1...Rb8!! is the right move.  Nothing else strikes the heart of the position.  Bishop moves wouldn&#039;t challenge white.  The variations after 1...Rb8!! are worth careful study.

It&#039;s pretty funny, the real issue is how can black activate his kingside pawns?  This is done with the aesthetic Rb8!! idea Rb3-Rf3.  That idea puts white under heavy pressur.   It&#039;s instructive how black&#039;s king does not participate for the moment, but in many structures after Rb8-b3-f3 it can run up and assist.  The maneuver ending with Rf3 frees up the black f-pawn to advance, after which the f4-e4 pawn are a formidable duo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1&#8230;Rb8!! is the right move.  Nothing else strikes the heart of the position.  Bishop moves wouldn&#8217;t challenge white.  The variations after 1&#8230;Rb8!! are worth careful study.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty funny, the real issue is how can black activate his kingside pawns?  This is done with the aesthetic Rb8!! idea Rb3-Rf3.  That idea puts white under heavy pressur.   It&#8217;s instructive how black&#8217;s king does not participate for the moment, but in many structures after Rb8-b3-f3 it can run up and assist.  The maneuver ending with Rf3 frees up the black f-pawn to advance, after which the f4-e4 pawn are a formidable duo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Test Your Strength Against USCL Games! IM Mark Ginsburg Challenges Fans! by AnlamK</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/test-your-strength-against-uscl-games-im-mark-ginsburg-challenges-fans/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>AnlamK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1580#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Here is my assesment of the position:
Black has 6 pawns versus White&#039;s 4 pawns. Nonetheless, Black&#039;s a6 and c7 pawns are weak. On the other hand, White enjoys the more active bishop - taking aim at the c7 pawn-, whereas Black&#039;s bishop is temporarily hemmed in by his pawns. White also has the more active rook, attacking the a6 pawn, whereas Black&#039;s rook is passively defending.

This also makes me wonder since we have opposite colored Bishops as the only minor pieces whether the position is a draw or whether Black can convert his extra 2 pawns to victory. 

I would probably play 1...Bc4. The idea is the following. I think the most testing reply is 2.Rc1. Here I foresee the following:

1...Bc4 2.Rc1 Bb5 3.Bxc7 a6 and the unpleasant pin along the c-file plus the passed a-pawn give Black good game. So the following line is perhaps better for White:

Instead of 3.Bxc7, we have 3.Rxc7. Here if Black exchanges rook, it&#039;s probably drawish. So Black should probably play 3...Ra8. The idea is that checks against the Black king detract White from the goal of blocking the passed pawn. So after 3.Bxc7 Ra8 4.Rg7+ Kf8 5.Rxh7 a4, White&#039;s rook is out of game and if 6.Rh8+, we have 6...Bg8 7.Bd6+ Kf7. You don&#039;t want to exchange rooks because it&#039;s harder to push the passed pawn then.

So where does that leave White? 2.Rc1 with the idea of capturing the c7 pawn may not be such a good idea after all. But then if White plays anything else, then Black has kept his two pawn-lead and improved the position of his pieces. If white just sits there and does nothing, he will follow with ...Bb4, ...c6, ...Ra8, ..a5-a4. 

Of course, I may be wrong about all this! So let me know how well I did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my assesment of the position:<br />
Black has 6 pawns versus White&#8217;s 4 pawns. Nonetheless, Black&#8217;s a6 and c7 pawns are weak. On the other hand, White enjoys the more active bishop &#8211; taking aim at the c7 pawn-, whereas Black&#8217;s bishop is temporarily hemmed in by his pawns. White also has the more active rook, attacking the a6 pawn, whereas Black&#8217;s rook is passively defending.</p>
<p>This also makes me wonder since we have opposite colored Bishops as the only minor pieces whether the position is a draw or whether Black can convert his extra 2 pawns to victory. </p>
<p>I would probably play 1&#8230;Bc4. The idea is the following. I think the most testing reply is 2.Rc1. Here I foresee the following:</p>
<p>1&#8230;Bc4 2.Rc1 Bb5 3.Bxc7 a6 and the unpleasant pin along the c-file plus the passed a-pawn give Black good game. So the following line is perhaps better for White:</p>
<p>Instead of 3.Bxc7, we have 3.Rxc7. Here if Black exchanges rook, it&#8217;s probably drawish. So Black should probably play 3&#8230;Ra8. The idea is that checks against the Black king detract White from the goal of blocking the passed pawn. So after 3.Bxc7 Ra8 4.Rg7+ Kf8 5.Rxh7 a4, White&#8217;s rook is out of game and if 6.Rh8+, we have 6&#8230;Bg8 7.Bd6+ Kf7. You don&#8217;t want to exchange rooks because it&#8217;s harder to push the passed pawn then.</p>
<p>So where does that leave White? 2.Rc1 with the idea of capturing the c7 pawn may not be such a good idea after all. But then if White plays anything else, then Black has kept his two pawn-lead and improved the position of his pieces. If white just sits there and does nothing, he will follow with &#8230;Bb4, &#8230;c6, &#8230;Ra8, ..a5-a4. </p>
<p>Of course, I may be wrong about all this! So let me know how well I did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FM Elliott Liu Previews the Arizona-Miami Match by Frank</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/fm-elliott-liu-previews-the-arizona-miami-match/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 02:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1547#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Based on the recount of the driving story, I favor the interpretation of the World&#039;s Most Nervous Passenger and attribute that to said author.  

As far as the predictions, this is a tough match for Arizona all the way around.  Although I&#039;m a west coast guy, I think that team Orange will beat team cactus.  2.5 - 1.5 (0.5-0.5, 0-1, 1-0, 1-0)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on the recount of the driving story, I favor the interpretation of the World&#8217;s Most Nervous Passenger and attribute that to said author.  </p>
<p>As far as the predictions, this is a tough match for Arizona all the way around.  Although I&#8217;m a west coast guy, I think that team Orange will beat team cactus.  2.5 &#8211; 1.5 (0.5-0.5, 0-1, 1-0, 1-0)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FM Elliott Liu Previews the Arizona-Miami Match by Gary Burchard</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/fm-elliott-liu-previews-the-arizona-miami-match/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Burchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1547#comment-353</guid>
		<description>No!  Not more nicknames!  Didn&#039;t the League ban nicknames?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No!  Not more nicknames!  Didn&#8217;t the League ban nicknames?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FM Elliott Liu Previews the Arizona-Miami Match by Mark Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/11/fm-elliott-liu-previews-the-arizona-miami-match/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ginsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1547#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Contingency plans are underway for a ticker-tape parade downtown if Amanda wins again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contingency plans are underway for a ticker-tape parade downtown if Amanda wins again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Week 9 Recap! by bear alert 69</title>
		<link>http://arizonascorpionchess.com/2009/10/week-9-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>bear alert 69</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 03:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arizonascorpionchess.com/?p=1521#comment-340</guid>
		<description>yo grandals be lookin mad good yo in her mad win against that cat yo. i was all up in that shit commentin on her fashion choices n it was like wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo grandals be lookin mad good yo in her mad win against that cat yo. i was all up in that shit commentin on her fashion choices n it was like wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
