David Adelberg’s ” Chess Dad’s ” View of the USCL

Dan Adelberg, father of the “baby Scorpion” David Adelberg, writes about his family experience with the US Chess League. He also talks about David’s success so far in the season despite this being his debut.

It is now ” Mid Season” and I have had a new experience taking in my son’s first season with the US Chess League and the Arizona Scorpions. The US Chess League was a goal to strive for, especially since some of David’s friends in other cities participated in an occasional game.  As David’s play has improved, it seemed that there was a possibility for him to contribute perhaps as an alternate.  With so many chess players hoping to be on the team, it was very uncertain if he would make the roster even as an alternate.  When I spoke to Leo Martinez, AZ Scorpions Manager, he told me that there was a good possibility that he could make the roster.  Later , the prospects seem to wax and wane as Leo and Robby Adamson were performing various rating calculations and whether David’s coach would be available to play on the team.  When the Scorpions added GM Alejandro Ramirez and the possibility of two more GMs might move to Arizona, it seemed that it would not work out for the 2009 season.  Yet , the higher ratings of these players opened the door for David to make the team as his lower rating would apparently balance the lineup.

Chess- High Hopes, Low Expectations, No Guarantees

The season started with excitement of participating in an entirely new experience.  It is very special to be on a team with so many great people that David admires, respects, and have taught him so much.   David has not had much experience with team chess events, as his school has rarely fielded a full team in the National scholastic events.

We had hoped that David would benefit from the experience with competitive games without traveling.  Even though these games are not rated, it would be valuable practice and training.  Leo informed us that the first two matches would be in Tucson with David participating with the Tucson lineup, and some hesitation arose.  My wife questioned whether David could afford to miss part of school, and whether I could miss any part of work to drive to Tucson, play a late game, and make it back for him to be rested enough to function in school the next day.  Given the fact that airline travel is far more difficult and expensive, and since David and I are both comfortable with time pressure, the natural response was, “we are all in.” (Thanks to Poker Stars.Net for all of there support)

The season thus far has exceeded my expectations.  David has played in 4 matches thus far, and has been able to participate as a spectator at the Abstrax team site for one other match.  The support and encouragement of the Arizona chess community is awesome, and it is hard to believe that there were 82 people watching the match. The sites at the University of Arizona in Tucson as well as the Phoenix Abstrax site have been great, with separate rooms for spectators to view and analyze the games as they are being played.

The fear of mine was that David’s performance could drag the team’s overall performance but fortunately the opposite has occurred so far.

David has two draws and two exciting wins with three of the games with black pieces.  David’s win against the 2008 Board 4 All Star was an exciting game and received second place in the Game of the Week voting.  It was a beautifully played game , and it was fun for David and myself that so many chess enthusiasts and judges enjoyed and appreciated the game. Some judges and GMs thought the game was ” overrated ” and “nothing I havn’t seen or played before.”  David was indifferent to those comments , and was glad that GM Kacheishvili won the prize because he thought GM Giorgi’s game was a special novelty, and his humility is what makes this chess Dad so proud!

As I wrap up this midseason report, I hope that the Scorpions can gain momentum leading towards a possible playoff run. Go Scorpions, and watch out for “The Baby Scorpion.”

Dan Adelberg, Chess Dad

Interview with IM Levon Altounian

This week  I sat down with Scorpion veteran IM Levon Altounian (LA) to get his thoughts on the USCL, the great chess players in history, and the local chess scene.

Levon

EJ: Hello!

LA: Hello!

EJ: We are almost half way through your second season in the USCL. How has this season compared to last year?

LA: Interesting, very educational but strange at the same time. One of the nice surprises includes having a much better organized team, GM Alejandro Ramirez playing for our team, and the fact that U of A donated not 1 but 2 perfect rooms for our cause. In 1 room we play and in the other we have spectators listening to very insightful and interesting comments by experts or even an IM using a projector that shows all 4 games same time.

EJ: Speaking of Alejandro. You’re one of the few players that has been asked to play board 1 or 2. How has having a GM (or 2) on the team affected your play?

LA: Well, it was very nice having a strong GM on board 1, which makes me a pretty good board 2. At the same time there was more pressure “delivering” the point on that board. One of the nice things was that it is not just any GM we got. It was a guy we know very well now and I think everyone likes a lot. That brings something special to the table.

EJ: Is it a different type of preparation for board 2 than 1?

LA: Not really. For example, last week playing board 1 I played a person who could also be board 2 if they had a GM present themselves.

EJ: How about preparation from last year that’s changed for this year?

LA: Well, I think the anxiety is gone. Last year we were e-mailing each other like crazy 4 days before the match sharing info. This year- much more relaxed and we trust the players to do the job. If someone needs advice or some help- we all help each other. Considering our opponents also prepare, sometimes its complete luck or accident which opening or system we end up playing.

EJ: Being an experienced tournament player, does “history” against an opponent OTB translate to success in the USCL?

LA: I don’t think so. Of course if a 2300 plays a 2600 who beat him 6 times in a row- probably yes. But in our case so far we have not encountered any match where someone was afraid of the opponent or thought they would win easily. Of course for statistics and guessing the outcome- ratings, styles and their personal past encounters count for a little bit.

EJ: Maybe not afraid, but if you’ve played someone enough times does that experience help in preparation for a match?

LA: I can’t speak for others, but in my games I usually compensate my lack of studying chess or playing enough tournaments by a better preparation. So the more I know the person, better I feel.

EJ: Any idea who you’ve played the most games against in your past? Alejandro has mentioned playing against the Dallas team nearly 20 times each.

LA: You mean which team or a person?

EJ: A person.

LA: Oh, no one in particular. I came to Tucson from California and they are not yet in the USCL league, so have not played anyone more than once or twice I think. Plus when I play the same team- they always had different people on that board for each match.

EJ: Do you think CA will get a second team? Any old friends you hope would join the league?

LA: No idea. They are definitely strong enough for it. But management is important for such cases. All the friends unfortunately are also very dangerous players so …. :) They probably can make one team for South CA as the North CA has a great team already.

EJ: Perhaps if Alejandro can’t swing the schedule next year…

LA: Oh! you mean to invite them to play here ?

EJ: Not necessarily but if S-CA doesn’t want a team, it doesn’t mean we can’t have them! :)

LA: Yes, that is possible. However, there are few problems with that in my opinion. One is that I don’t like inviting an outsider who no one knows- We are used to people we know- we are spoiled. :) Two- since there is a cap in rating- only very high rated players make sense to invite. I would love to have someone like Akobian here for board 1.

EJ: Team spirit is important to the Scorpions.

LA: Yes, very. One of the reasons I played in it and went through nightmarish schedule changes was the team spirit. I like literally everyone how is on the team and know the Tucson players very well. I really like what Leo Martinez is doing as a manager, I like Robby and Ginsburg being on the team, I like all that the younger generations- Adelberg, Amanda Mateer, Ben Marmont, you name it- all either play or help us. I also like how the Phoenix line up looks. I have a huge respect for Barcenilla and love being on a team with Danny Rensch. Now that he got his last IM norm, he promised he will IM-ise everyone. :)

EJ: I couple of “elects” that need their titles.

LA: Yeah, true, which speaks well for Arizona. Getting titles is hard here and it is hard to travel. I hope time will come when with all the combined forces we can organize a titled tournament in Tucson.

EJ: I’ll see what I can do about that. :) Although Danny has done a great job with the CopperState. I know you’re one of the few members with family that makes traveling difficult. How do you “keep sharp”?

LA: Well, I am not “sharp” at tournaments unfortunately. It is a relative term.

EJ: Sharp enough to win a couple of state championships. Congratulations on that by the way.

LA: Thanks :) I play ICC and use tournaments such as the local scholastic League Match as a way to prepare for the whole year. Kind of like a “camel effect” – learn enough new stuff for 1 big tournament and then use it for the year. I am not as sharp as I could be if I played as much as I did 10 years ago but sometimes I do OK. :)

EJ: I’m sure many of your opponent’s would disagree. So you think being “off the grid” helps you in the USCL?

LA: well, I am good at boring chess and psychology. :) More the opposite – USCL helps me “get on the grid”. :)

EJ: I’m wondering if opponents are having a difficult time to prepare for you.

LA: Well, that too. For example- in the last game against Baltimore I prepared well enough to not only guess the opening we would have but the exact position to move 13, including his novelty. All worked perfectly.. but I still drew.

EJ: Best laid plans…

LA: I am more a chess “theoretician” than a player I guess. I was only half joking when I mentioned in the blog that I need to play the opening and then let Alejandro or someone else play after that. :)

EJ: Without tipping off any future opponents, are there any openings or lines that you “dream” to play?

LA: I wish when I was younger someone made me play “correct” openings – like najdorf sicilian, Slav defense and not the “weirdo” ones I usually play. Now I am too old for those unless Leo and the team wants to have a heart attack watching me play those :)

EJ: A little excitement is a good thing. I’m a fan of the Latvian, personally. :)

LA: Latvian I played few times. It is better than its reputation. There was a guy in Orange County- rated about 2300. He only played Latvian and when his opponent wouldn’t let him do it- he was taking it very personally. What is interesting is that in blitz I do very well and make probably less mistakes than in a tournament, where I try to find the most perfect move each time

EJ: Perhaps we need to suggest a Blitz league. Just don’t decide to let your time run down to test this out. I don’t think your fans could take the excitement.

LA: That is what happened in few of my USCL games where I was winning and found the ‘only” way to not win by trying to win the “best” way. That is actually one problem with USCL. I find that for me in tournaments when I am in time pressure- it is much easier to play than to play for the team. A lot of unseen pressure and many times other boards start calculating my game to figure out what to do on theirs and vice versa. But that is the name of the game.

EJ: You set the tone.

LA: I think it has to do with the fact that we really care.

EJ: But I’m know many of the players have complete faith in you. You’re not called “the Solid” without a reason.

LA: The big faith is “Lev will be fine”. :) I am the disciple of Tigran Petrosian- the most solid player ever!

EJ: Is he your favorite player in history?

LA: However, maybe it was not the best idea in the long run . Tal would be a better model. :) The more I learn about chess, the more I move from Botvinik/ Petrosian/ Capablanca to names like Kasparov, Ivanchuk and Kramnik. For example- how do we compare the natural talent of Capablanca to the extreme preparation skills of Kasparov? I was blown away by Garry’s game against #2 seed Anand years ago, when he prepared until move 41, where he is up a piece and needed FRITZ to tell him how to win it… all done before the game even started.

EJ: If you could be board 2 on a team with any player, who would you like to play along with? No disrespect to our current Scorpions.

LA: Well, honestly, unless we talk about the top 10 in the world, I am good enough to give a very strong fight to anyone. So I would not want to play board 2 with egoistical or cocky players. All others would be fine. Alejandro, Rojelio Barcenilla, they are great to play with. It would be fun to be in a team with Nakamura probably and see his “Nakamura effect” from the “good side” and rather than being the receiving end of it. USCL board 1 is usually so tough anyways- no one has a chance for going perfect.

EJ: Perhaps the USCL needs an “All-star game”.

LA: USCL went from something small to something very big and important, thanks to relentless work of Greg Shahade. So I would not be surprised if they invented some other type of matches.

EJ: I think seeing a SoCal team would be a lot of fun.

LA: He also had the poker websites do most of the sponsoring so I am sure some high-end poker-like ideas are in his mind for the USCL.

EJ: I’m 0-3 in getting a prediction out of these interviews. Any thoughts on the match this week against Dallas?

LA: I don’t know… we all say we are great and then it all comes down to one move of one of the games. :) So predicting it has a wrong karma effect it seems.

EJ: Fair enough…

LA: If all boards do the way they should- we should win. I think the main battle will be if Robby can win his game on board 3.

EJ: I meant to ask, is there anything like the USCL back in Europe when you played?

LA: Well, the USCL took a format similar to German bundesleagues. Which is copied in nearly every self-respecting chess country.

EJ: Did you play in those?

LA: No, I was too young for those and too much into architecture studies, unfortunately, but it is a wonderful system. People can concentrate on being a professional in chess.

EJ: Well, I for one am glad we have the USCL and the Arizona Scorpions.

LA: Yes, and that is why I hope everyone can support the Scorpions. (Leo can tell you how !)

EJ: I really hope the younger kids from the community follow the matches. I would have killed to have had something like this when I was in school. Watching my idols play each week.

EJ: Anything you’d like to say before we wrap up?

LA: Well, I would probably like to take a moment and talk about the Tucson chess scene. I am very optimistic about chess in Tucson and Arizona in general. That is one of my drives and motivations for being on the USCL team.

EJ: Sure… You’re a very active coach outside of the USCL. Feel free talk about your life outside of the USCL.

LA: I think all the organizations here and individuals are working towards the same goal of providing chess education to people of any and every age and strength, and I really like how SACA has evolved from more less passive organization to much more active role and that is thanks to Karen Pennock (SACA President), Jon Shacter, volunteers and you. I like what 9 Queens is doing here, the USCL team, all the work Leo, Robby, others put in and I especially like that there is very little clash of interests.

EJ: There’s that team spirit again. :)

LA: I would love to see more unique events here like simuls, bughouse tournaments, matches between organizations- like Raytheon and U of A and some tournaments similar to the very successful types Danny runs in Phoenix so we do not have half the Tucson travel to Phoenix to compete.

EJ: I’m sure if there’s a will, there’s a way.

LA: With Tucson chess growing, Arizona Chess for Schools growing and my daughter Ani growing- I can hopefully play more chess and hopefully get my GM title.

EJ: That would be wonderful! Well, I think that wraps up for us now. Thank you for sitting down to chat and good luck to the Scorpions!

Learn more about Levon’s Arizona Chess For Schools at their  website. You will find all the connections with the coaches, schools, and organizations involved.

Week 5 Preview By Leo Martinez — Arizona Scorpions vs. Carolina Cobras

Week 5 is underway for the Scorpions on Wednesday with a match against the Carolina Cobras. This is a match that had caught my eye from the beginning of the season as my good friend Craig Jones is the manager and usual 4th board for the Cobras. Craig used to live and coach in Tucson for a long time but moved to North Carolina 6 years ago. I have had many talks with Craig about the league and about other teams in the league as well as our respective teams. Now our teams will have to face each other!

Carolina is a team that many expected to finish last in the Eastern Conference but have surprised some people with a 2-2 record from the first four matches with an especially impressive 4-0 win last week versus the struggling New York Knights. Being a clash of teams with 2-2 records in opposite divisions this becomes a very important match for each team as the middle of the season approaches.

Let’s look at the lineups for each team (Photos by Amanda Mateer and James Martin):

Board 1
IM Levon Altounian 2535 vs. IM Lev Milman 2502

This is a very interesting matchup pitting two strong International Masters against one another. These two have played once before in the 2005 US Championships a while back that ended in a draw. However, considering Levon’s strength playing White and Milman’s impressive win last week against GM Shabalov this game should be anything but peaceful.

Board 2
FM Oleg Zaikov 2376 vs. IM Mark Ginsburg 2410

Another close match of an experienced International Master that has been on the scene for a couple decades versus a strong college student that has done well in the US Chess League in the past. Although Oleg has generally played the most and done best on board 3 in past seasons he does have strong wins over IM Justin Sarkar and FM Todd Andrews on board 2 this season.

Board 3
FM Robby Adamson 2377 vs. FM Ron Simpson 2346

Both of these players have played board 3 most of the season and both come off wins for their respective teams with Robby defeating FM Todd Andrews to help Arizona beat Tennessee and Ron Simpson beating IM Jay Bonin of New York. This is also the first season for both players as Ron Simpson is a new addition to the Cobras. Both are aggressively minded which should create a lot of fireworks!

Board 4
NM Craig Jones 2320 vs. NM Warren Harper 2350

Like all the others, rating wise this matchup is very close. Warren will have a chance to avenge his previous losses in the league while also playing his toughest competitor yet in Craig Jones. Craig comes off a very nice win against WFM Iryna Zenyuk of New York. These two fourth boards are both very strong and pit two of the highest rated 4th boards in the league against one another.

As you can see all four of these games are very close in rating and strength and literally anything is possible. Check out the match live at the University of Arizona, Cesar Chavez Building (5th Floor) 1110 E James E. Rogers Way Tucson, AZ or on ICC at 6:00 PM AZ time. Go Scorpions !

Lineup for Second Match Announced !

The Lineups for the Second Match have been announced ! This was a match that we immediately spotted when the schedule was released as it was against the Defending Champions, the Dallas Destiny. This team, similar to us, has a very balanced roster almost every round and, as was shown last year, can compete with any team. This will be a competitive match! Okay on to the match ups!

The names listed to the left have White for the game while the names in bold are Scorpion players.

Dallas Destiny vs Arizona Scorpions

Board 1
IM Drasko Boskovic (2507)IM Levon Altounian (2535)

Board 2
FM Danny Rensch (2411) IM John Bartholomew (2488)

Board 3
FM Igor Schneider (2397)FM Robby Adamson (2377)

Board 4
NM Warren Harper (2351) NM Bayaraa Zorigt (2217)

All the ratings are current and are not the ratings being used for the league. As you can see this will be a very tight match. As I have said from the beginning it will all come down to who plays well and who doesn’t. I have my own feelings about the match but I will leave the predictions to others. Come cheer our team on at the Eastside Chess Club at the Jewish Community Center in Tucson!

Analysis and Summary — Arizona Scorpions vs. Chicago Blaze

This match was pretty interesting. The games were played at Levon Altounian’s house and were supposed to start around 630 PM Tucson time (930 PM ET). Around 6:29 PM our internet went out probably affected by the weather as it was raining in Tucson the entire day. However, everything turned out alright with the internet not out long and the games started slightly late around 6:35 PM or so.

Check out Robby Adamson’s summary of the games from the first match below. I wanted to put a little bit of analysis and explanation on some of the games this week as well (in order of how they finished):

Week 1:
Arizona (2.5) —- Chicago (1.5)

Board 4
Ilan Meerovich (CHC) vs NM Warren Harper (ARZ) 1-0

This game was tough as we had not expected a Saimisch with 6. f3 and instead had reviewed over some lines for 4. e3 as we had seen Ilan play this before. Warren thought for 16 minutes on 8…f5? showing that he did not know this specific line. The main line goes 8…b6 planning to play a quick 9…Ba6. He probably got confused in that after both of the other theoretical moves, 8. Qd2 and 8 dc5 (the main line), Black can play 8…f5. The difference is that in the game White can play 9. e4 immediately and has no problems developing his kingside while also keeping a large center. After 8. Qd2 f5 9. e4 is not possible due to 9…fe4 10. fe4 Qh4+. After this inaccuracy Black seemed very cramped and his pieces did not have good squares. On top of this White had the center. Of course if Warren gets a good opening he is a very impressive player however in this case Warren’s position after the opening didn’t give him a chance to show this. After 15. e5! Black was already suffering and after some accurate moves by Ilan (16. Qg6 and 17. Qg3) the game ended quickly.

Board 3
FM Robby Adamson (ARZ) vs NM Jon Burgess (CHC) 1-0

This game was very strange all around and to add to this was Robby’s terrible time management. Robby had prepared some of this line himself. Despite this Robby was down to 4 minutes while his opponent still had 38 minutes by move 20. However the time control used had a 30 second increment which means that after every move you play 30 seconds is added to your clock. This allows players to play out of their time trouble to some extent.
As he mentions Milov, one of the Kan’s experts, has been playing 5…Ne7 recently. I had thought that 7. Nb3 was the common way to play against …Ne7 in the Sicilian discoordinating the knights but maybe the way Robby played was also promising. Robby was loving his position around moves 15 and 16 however I’m not sure if I share his opinion that “I was winning after 16. g5″ as he said at the team dinner afterward. However he did seem to play pretty well having the initiative and attack on the kingside for most of the game. However some of Black’s moves (15…Rfe8) were debatable. However after 20…d5 all of a sudden it’s not clear where White’s attack is going to breakthrough. I was analyzing 23…Qxg6 during the game trying to figure out what White’s way to breakthrough was as it seemed to me that White had overextended. I ended up thinking that 24. Rxb7 Nxb7 25. Nc5 was just good for White. Luckily after 25. Qh5 Black completely missed the threat of 26. Rxg7 mating and Robby was able to end the game very nicely. This game was also crucial as it gave the remaining two games some encouragement and in some ways changed the momentum of the match. After that the body language of Lev and Mark seemed much more positive to me.

Board 1
IM Levon Altounian (ARZ) vs IM Jan van de Mortel (CHC) 1-0

This game was the best played game of the match with Lev holding a slight edge for most of the game and really pushing for a win due to the match situation. Lev’s aggressive intentions were obvious early when he played 13 h4 instead of playing quieter. The game really heated up when White played 24 b4! playing on both sides of the board. Lev was slightly afraid of 27. bc5 f5!? when after 28 cb6 the position looks good for White but looks very wild. But Black played 27…bc5 very quickly and this was a critical moment. It seems that 28. Nc5 was an innaccuracy as it allows a tactic while first 28. Rb8 Rb8 29 Nc5 avoided this tactic. Warren and I were analyzing, unsuccessfully, in a different room trying our best to understand all the tactics in the position around move 28 trying to piece apart what Levon was doing. We hadn’t seen Black’s saving idea which both players also missed. After 32 Ne4 Black had 32…Rb8! 31 Qa1 Ra8 32 Qb1 and here Black has a draw with 32…Rb8 (which would have been good for the match situation) or can go for something else with 32…Ra2!. Of course with both players having 2-3 minutes seeing all this was pretty difficult. Anyways after 32…f5? Black is losing after the forced line in the game with the very nice 36. Qb4! attacking f8 and mate on h4 being a nice final touch. After this nice game by Lev the match score was 2-1.

Board 2
FM Mehmed Pasalic (CHC) vs IM Mark Ginsburg (ARZ) 1/2-1/2

This game was the last to finish and was tight the entire way. Arizona needed a draw to win the match and Chicago of course had to win. These two players played fairly recently with Mark drawing with Black that time as well. The opening was well played by both players and even 15…Qc5!? is actually a common idea and is used in these types of positions sometimes when you get the tempo on the knight on d4. Around move 24 Mark offered a draw but at this point it seemed that Pasalic had to go all out for a win in order to save the match for Chicago. After a while the pawn structure stabilized and Black had the two bishops but White was slightly better due to his strong knight on c5. At this point most of the team was watching the match in another room, too nervous to go and look at Mark’s game directly. Black lost a pawn on move 47 due to some “sneaky” play according to Mark. However, Black has some chances due to his active rook, two bishops, and the mutual time trouble. Both players had 1-2 minutes left at this point. Both players missed that after 53 Rb3 Black has 53…Ba6! which looks ok for Black after 54. Na6 Rb3 55 Qb3 Qa6. Black didn’t play 54…Qb4 due to 55. Qc8 Qb3 56 Qh8 Kg5 57. h4 Kf4 58 Qh6 winning for White.
After 58…Qa7 Black finally got some active moves in with 61…Qf7 (Lev and I were analyzing 61…Qa2 which was also interesting) and 62…Qh5 and and after 65…Qg5 a couple moves later Pasalic had to accept that the position was drawn.

A crazy match ! Stay tuned for more updates as well as many photos which were taken by Amanda Mateer and will be posted by her soon. Thanks go out to Amanda, Ben Marmont, and Pasha Savine for their help in relaying the games and taking pictures as well as to all our spectators.

Until next Wednesday on September 3rd when we play the defending champions, the Dallas Destiny!

Scorpions Player wins Local Tournament !

At the recently played Ye Olde Pueblo Open in Tucson, Arizona Levon Altounian tied for first place with GM Alejandro Ramirez. Both of these players won 4 1/2 out of their 5 games to finish clear of the rest of the participants. This tournament ran directly after the Western Invitational Chess Camp which occurs in Tucson and features such teachers as US Champion GM Yuri Shulman, GM Gregory Kaidanov, GM Alejandro Ramirez, IM Levon Altounian, FM Danny Rensch, FM Robby Adamson, and FM Ken Larsen. This camp is run by Robby Adamson.

Congratulations to Scorpions player Levon Altounian !

An Arizona Team in the US Chess League — the Arizona Scorpions!

Hello all !

As has been announced recently on http://www.uschessleague.com/ Arizona has joined the US Chess League and will be playing under the name Arizona Scorpions next season! This is a great chance to join an upcoming league and compete against some of the best players in the nation.

The teams in the league have 8 players with 2 alternate players(who can play only one or two games) during the season. During one match only 4 players can play at a time and their average rating must be 2400 or below. This makes the players chosen for the team important as a team needs to be well rounded and not simply the top players.

The Manager of our team will be Leo Martinez, while the only Assistant Manager at the moment is Robby Adamson. What makes our team unique is that Tucson and Phoenix are included in the team and the team will be playing in both cities throughout the season. Since we have strong players scattered throughout the state this makes our team stronger and easier to coordinate.

So far we have committments from IM Levon Altounian, IM Mark Ginsburg, FM Danny Rensch, FM Robby Adamson, FM Ken Larsen, and NM Leo Martinez. We have many others interested and will be announcing other committments throughout this blog.

If anyone has any questions about the league or the team please reply to this blog.